I had wanted to wait till the class had finished
discussing the entire book before I did my typical rants to prevent any
spoilers. I believe that Meg Cabot was cleaver in her attempt to interest
the younger reader – hormonal teenage girls.
Coming from a high school that closely resembles
the activities of Avalon High, including the crazy guy who wants to kill
someone, I find the book disturbing. I don't agree with some things that
she assimilates with stereotypes. One in particular that if you have
piercings, tattoos, it automatically makes someone a drug addict. All
though, I find it would be financially beneficial for the government to
legalize weed, I am not a drug addict. I also fit into that
"jock" stereotype in high school and I was a bit confused by the
football game scene. Was Lance substituted in for the play Will was
leveled? Or was he so lost in Jenny’s eyes he walked off the field before
the play even started, but then how did no one notice he was missing,
especially will. Either or, speaking from experience, if that would ever
to happen, and if Lance was still on the team the next practice, he would be
put through the work out of his life. I don't think that she fully
understood the game of football to accurately describe a play in which Lance is
not on the field.
While reading this book I tried to read this as if I was
still in grade school and even in my younger mind, I still would have thought Elaine
running in the storm of the century was odd. There had to have been at
least one person that was driving by or even looking out their window as she
ran by and though "hmmmm high school girl, running in the rain, with no
rain coat, except the only one trying to conceal something. That is a little odd". My biggest
fear is thunder storms, so my skin was crawling with the idea someone is so
idiotic to be running two miles in a storm with a lighting conductor. I
was hoping she would be struck and that's how the book ended to be
honest.
As I said in class, Marco should had shot will and Elaine
seconds after showing he had a gun. This type of a bad guy to spill the
entire plan to the potential victims, then turn it around and the victims
defeat the bad guy is very cliché. Even in my high school mind, I wanted
Marco to be done with it. I just did not like the transition between
Marco pulling out the gun, Elaine throwing the sword, and then Marco giving
up.
In my last blog I talked about the potential
sword vs. gun scenario. So as it is quite obvious I am a bit agitated
that a sword was brought to a gun fight, and actually won. I would have
to admit though that through all the reasons for me to be upset, Meg Cabot did
what I believe she wanted to do. She wanted to talk about the Arthur
story in a way that people today can relate to.
I did enjoy the partially factual stuff in the back
of the book, but I do not know how many kids would actually turn the pages to
actually read this part of the book. I thought maybe she should have put
this in the beginning of the book, but kids skip that part too. At first
I didn't pick up on The Lady of Shallot in the beginning of each chapter, but
once Dr. MB pointed it out it still didn't make a difference. I had read
them, and then proceeded to read the chapter and completely forgetting what
part of the poem she thought was related to the text. It might have
behooved her to write parts of the poem and a chapter title, not just part of
the poem.
I agree that some of the stereotypes depicted in this reading were off putting. Just because someone has tattoos and piercing does not make them a drug addict. There are a lot of people today that have these things and there not drug addicts.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with you, Sarah. A lot (although not all) of the drug addicts I know are the clean cut types who are just spending daddy's money. As someone who has two tattoos but has never touched drugs in her life, I find Meg Cabot's generalizations to be outdated and a bit offensive.
DeleteTom, your title is what drew me in, and I find it both funny and true. This NEVER should have been made into a movie. Those tax dollars were wasted.
ReplyDeleteThe book should never have been made into a movie. I agree with that whole-heartedly. But if it had to be could they have at least made an attempt at following the plot? Any little try towards matching the book would be appreciated.
DeleteYou said you "don't agree with some things that she assimilates with stereotypes. One in particular that if you have piercings, tattoos, it automatically makes someone a drug addict." Well I definitely agree. I do not agree with the stereotypes. This offends most people, but I am going to play devil's advocate, have you never had prejudice thoughts in your life???? I know have, then I have to check myself. Ellie may not be as street smart as we may think or expect. I'm saying this because of her thoughts and some of her actions. She seems really immature in her way of thinking. For example, she forgets everything else when Will calls her Elle. She can't help but get lost in his blue eyes. My point is, is that she is still young and the prejudice statement was her thoughts. We are all young at one point and she is still very immature in her way of thinking. Secondly, I also agree with you about the football part. I, too, was lost. I wasn't sure if Lance was supposed to be in the play? Or did he just walk off the field? I'm not sure exactly what happened, but thought SOMEONE, at least the Coach if not Will, would notice that he walked off the field to talk to Jen, a cheerleader. It sounds totally ridiculous and non realistic.
ReplyDeleteWho knows guys...I mean what was said about the movie and watching the trailer made it look ghastly, but if it had actually followed the true story line, I think it could have had a better outcome. If it had quality production and a less cheesier set up, it could have been up there on the Top Disney Channel Movies like Zenon or Halloween Town.
ReplyDelete